COMMENT ⊗   VALID 00003 PAGES
C REC  PAGE   DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002	aaai[f82,jmc]		To do as president
C00008 00003	1983 August Council meeting
C00009 ENDMK
C⊗;
aaai[f82,jmc]		To do as president

1. A quarterly "president's message".

a. Let's work on the fundamental problems of AI - not so much on tools
for debugging and on demos.  We need to discuss what we think of the
progress and not spend our time arguing with outsiders.
The sponsors are distorting the field, but it's really more
our fault than theirs.  Not all problems are
equally suited for scientific progress.


I'll tell you what I think the fundamental problems are, but if you
differ, I urge you to decide what you think is fundamental and work
on that.  Chess is the drosophila?

b. The orderly expansion of the field.  No quick tenure.  Keep
room for newcomers.

c. What should AAAI be?  (1) A scientific organization and not
a trade union, i.e. rewards the best work rather than advances
everyone in the field.

d. Presidential address.  Epistemological problems of AI.
The search for generality in AI.

e. What does a university need for ai research?  What should be
taught?

f. Criteria for testing and comparing theories in AI.  Chess as
sport and as a drosophila.  Compare VanLehn, Kurt, John Seely Brown
and James Greeno
"Competitive Argumentation in Computational Theories
of Cognition", to appear in Methods and Tactics in Cognitive Science,
W. Kinsch, J. Miller and P. Polson (Eds.) New York: Erlbaum

Perhaps I should try to meet various people:
nsf, arpa, afosr,onr, aro, ai in medicine, acm, ieee pattern, ams, aaas
nat. acad., keyworth

Perhaps there should be a small journal, AI reviews, that would critically
review important papers and would help form public opinion on what
constitutes good work in ai.
What consitutes verification of ai ideas? van Lehn at xerox.

conferences:
epistemology, common sense, planning (Sacerdoti), curriculum, standards
for judging work

prizes: not me

Rick Hayes-Roth and Bob Englemore want a more "professional" organization.
Their clients found AAAI-82 unhelpful and the presentations
not very good.

1983 July 3
The most commonly misused word in computer science is "understand".  A
good explanation of the varieties of understanding will be important.


The following item will be on the agenda of the part of the AAAI
executive committee meeting that will be chaired by John McCarthy.
There may be one additional item.

AAAI sponsored workshops.  They would emphasize special research
topics.  Tentatively, each will be organized by a single individual
who will decide on location (usually near his own), what papers will
be presented, and criteria for attendance.  It is hoped that many of
them will be sufficiently specialized that there will be little need
for selectivity in either papers or attendance.  Tentatively also,
no funds will be sought to support the workshops and participants will
make their own travel and housing arrangements.  In short, the object
is to reduce the ratio of organizational to scientific work.
JMC suggests workshops on some of the following:

	a. non-monotonic reasoning
	b. pattern matching and unification
	c. planning
	d. learning
	e. curriculum
	f. criteria for judging progress in AI
	g. formalization of common sense

	Those contemplating volunteering to organize one of the above or
to propose or organize others should think about as many details as
possible in advance of the meeting so as to make proposals as precise as
possible.
1983 August Council meeting
	Fredkin-Gunkel proposal for meeting
	Lou Robinson?
	staffing status and intentions
	membership attitude survey
	on-line abstracts and papers

	subsidize H.S. book
	research expository articles
	post doctoral fellowships

	learning - Tom Mitchell
	common sense physics - Pat Hayes
	non-monotonic reasoning - Ray Reiter and Bonny Webber